Refined Search
KDis -2228/03 LRA-3 DI 4-4-03 District Registration(General) Authority : Court
Board/LRC Proceedings-Held to be for eligible concession available to Co-operative Societies under G.O.(MS) No.795/60/Agri Dated 08/10/1960.
Board/LRC Proceedings-Held to be for eligible concession available to Co-operative Societies under G.O.(MS) No.795/60/Agri Dated 08/10/1960.
P/1 to P6 ,SRO,Thodupuzha
R.R4-29339/01 Authority :
Stamp Duty-Exemption allowed to employees-Scince and Technology Museum-under the impression that they are Government employees. IGR directed this was not in order and asked the officers who registered the documents to make good the loss.
Making good the loss by Registering officers.
No.D.Dis.L.R.A3-9172/2000 Order Authority : Court
Board/LRC Proceedings-Sub Registrar impounded the document opining that it can not be classified as Exchanged as styled by the party. The DR A opined that since party had no full title it can not be treated as exchange.IGR opined that "two persons" need n
Board/LRC Proceedings-Sub Registrar impounded the document opining that it can not be classified as Exchanged as styled by the party. The DR A opined that since party had no full title it can not be treated as exchange.IGR opined that "two persons" need n
P7/98 of SRP Perinthalamanna.
G.O.(P) No. 224/2007/TD G. O. Authority : GOK- Tax (E) Department
Certified Copies-Adhesive Stamps-Amendment making possible of affixing adhesive stamps on "copies of documents printed using computer systems,that is certified copies"
Certified Copies-Adhesive Stamps-Amendment making possible of affixing adhesive stamps on "copies of documents printed using computer systems,that is certified copies"
S.R.O.No.934/2007
C.R. Sindhu vs State Of Kerala And Ors. ORDER V. R C.R. Sindhu vs State Of Kerala And Ors. ORDER V. R Authority : Government(govt)
Mortgage by conditional sale-So far as the contention of the learned Counsel for defendant No. 1 that the mortgage money was not paid within the time stipulated in the document and, therefore, the transaction, even if it was a mortgage, became an absolute
1. In this revision filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. the revision petitioner challenges the order dated 22-2-2007 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram in C.M.P. 5129 of 2006 appointing an Advocate Commission to